Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 08 Jan 2001 17:02:41 +0200
From:      Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc:        Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>, Ilya Martynov <m_ilya@agava.com>, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: Is there any reason for FETCH_BEFORE_ARGS?
Message-ID:  <5.0.2.1.2.20010108170109.02eb68c0@192.168.1.50>
In-Reply-To: <xzpn1d2i4u1.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
References:  <Maxim Sobolev's message of "Fri, 05 Jan 2001 14:01:12 %2B0200"> <20010105133600.E10329@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <20010105124725.D10329@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101051416230.52070-100000@juil.domain> <20010105133600.E10329@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <5.0.2.1.2.20010105135621.024d0550@192.168.1.50>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 14:52 08.01.01, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG> writes:
> > Needless complexity, especially considering that `-b' is compatibility
> > option which is likely to be deleted soon
>
>I have no plans to remove support for the -b and -t options any time
>soon. I simply don't see any reason to do so.

I mean removal of FETCH_BEFORE_ARGS=-b from /usr/ports/*/*/Makefile.

-Maxim



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.0.2.1.2.20010108170109.02eb68c0>