Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 16:54:34 +0100 From: Thomas Moestl <tmoestl@gmx.net> To: Oliver Blasnik <oliver.blasnik@de.tiscali.com> Cc: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>, freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: pci quad hme ethernet card Message-ID: <20021205155434.GB305@crow.dom2ip.de> In-Reply-To: <000c01c29c76$4b5faab0$1d0a310a@de.tiscali.com> References: <20021203124613.L35729@locore.ca> <010d01c29b74$65d3b4c0$2100a8c0@xpath1000> <20021204140045.S35729@locore.ca> <005b01c29c42$93cc75a0$2100a8c0@xpath1000> <20021205121437.GA305@crow.dom2ip.de> <009f01c29c5f$a09942a0$1d0a310a@de.tiscali.com> <20021205151924.GA305@crow.dom2ip.de> <000c01c29c76$4b5faab0$1d0a310a@de.tiscali.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2002/12/05 at 16:52:20 +0100, Oliver Blasnik wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > > Hummm, that looks quite normal, the ATA controller should get > > interrupt 2 and the hmes 3, 4, 1 and 2. > > That was like _before_ I updated to the latest sources. Funny... > Not. > > > This sound like the old behavior a lot, are you sure that your > > sources are up to date and there are no local diffs? > > :-( There was ONE local diff, resulting from the old patch on > this list, and cvs had not complained... Ok, after changing this, > the irq assignment gets back to the old behavior, also atapci > gets irq 2 as it should. > > Nevertheless, hme0-3 (qfe) don't work (hme0: device timeout). Which interrupts do they get assigned now? - Thomas -- Thomas Moestl <tmoestl@gmx.net> http://www.tu-bs.de/~y0015675/ <tmm@FreeBSD.org> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~tmm/ PGP fingerprint: 1C97 A604 2BD0 E492 51D0 9C0F 1FE6 4F1D 419C 776C To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021205155434.GB305>