Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 11:11:07 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> To: Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn@gmail.com> Cc: Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mesa-dri uses llvm60 Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1901121108520.13279@sea.ntplx.net> In-Reply-To: <20190112150932.6a70784b@ernst.home> References: <23609.9020.600859.127925@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20190112101010.2ebfb955@ernst.home> <23609.58491.10199.676646@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <CAPS9%2BStGXBokDFG38kW26xbux4vW8Aa=_W_POYD9RfPe_WufSw@mail.gmail.com> <23609.60774.88807.167712@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20190112150932.6a70784b@ernst.home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 12 Jan 2019, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 08:36:38 -0500 > Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> wrote: > >> Andreas Nilsson writes: >> >>> As far as I know full llvm is needed ( or at least used to be ) >>> because the one in base is missing a few key pieces used for >>> mesa-dri. >> >> Aha! >> > > Right, it needs at least llvm-config, which is not in base. Pity. Just thinking out loud, can the missing llvm bits be a port, such that building the missing pieces use what's already in base? -- DE
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.64.1901121108520.13279>