Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 19:13:35 +0200 From: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?] Message-ID: <200410201913.42879.max@love2party.net> In-Reply-To: <20041020170907.GA1216@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> References: <41767CF1.2020005@FreeBSD.org> <20041020.105839.100358845.imp@bsdimp.com> <20041020170907.GA1216@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart1937739.bJVac5Oj7T Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Why is this discussion ongoing? The consensus seems pretty clear: "Implemen= t=20 it, but have a make.conf option to turn it off." If there is concern with=20 this make if default to off and have an option to turn it on. I don't see the point in exchanging details on how cheap or expensive disk= =20 space or admin time is these days. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --nextPart1937739.bJVac5Oj7T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBdpzGXyyEoT62BG0RAqQBAJ48AwPCURpk44AhqxytnkPIOqwqeQCdG/GV ORRYjguDmE7Oh/Lmdw+5W4M= =Pffp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1937739.bJVac5Oj7T--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200410201913.42879.max>