Date: Mon, 06 Feb 1995 14:50:01 -0800 From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@ref.tfs.com> Cc: CVS-commiters@freefall.cdrom.com, cvs-lib@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen getcwd.c Message-ID: <199502062250.OAA00576@corbin.Root.COM> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 06 Feb 95 12:12:50 PST." <199502062012.MAA06540@ref.tfs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>> I feel this change is a loser... I feel very uncomfortable changing >> 15 years of historical behavior for a minor performance gain... that's >> not the way performance gains are supposed to be eeked out. > >Ok: we'll take a vote! I vote to kill the change and go back to the previous (slow) behavior. We should not be making changes that have unknown consequences at this point in the 2.1 development cycle (well, at any point in any developement cycle) - especially if we wish 2.1 to be solid. -DG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199502062250.OAA00576>