Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 16:18:51 -0700 From: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@westhill.cdrom.com> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: in_rtqtimo: adjusted rtq_reallyold to 2400 Message-ID: <2998.803171931@westhill.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Jun 1995 12:43:18 EDT." <9506141643.AA03402@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <9506141643.AA03402@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollman wri tes: >What this means is that the kernel IP per-host cache timeout code >noticed that you had a lot of unreferenced routes piling up in the >cache, and it has taken steps to reduce the expiration time in hopes >of reducing this to a number it considers reasonable. >The following sysctl(8) parameters control the operation of this >function: >net.inet.ip.rtexpire = 3600 # the expiration time >net.inet.ip.rtminexpire = 10 # the minimum expiration time >net.inet.ip.rtmaxcache = 128 # how many is ``too many'' Can one of the FAQ maintainers please stick this in a FAQ - it seems like a good candidate... Gary
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2998.803171931>