Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 Dec 2008 22:41:34 +0700
From:      Eugene Grosbein <eugen@kuzbass.ru>
To:        pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com>
Cc:        Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ipfw2.c,v 1.76.2.17
Message-ID:  <20081202154134.GA73002@svzserv.kemerovo.su>
In-Reply-To: <a31046fc0812020702r2a3e5241m1844f137c4cf66a@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <a31046fc0812020702r2a3e5241m1844f137c4cf66a@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 06:02:16PM +0300, pluknet wrote:

> Since this revision (appeared in 6.3) I think ipfw violates POLA.
> I mean "ipfw table N list" shows values of table in Internet '.' notation.
> 
> A friend of mine was surprised to found Internet representation
> of this "optional 32-bit unsigned value".
> 
> For example security/bruteblock stores unix timestamps here
> and AFAICS there is no possibility to come back to the previous
> output format (other than reverting this revision).

That was fixed 8 months ago. Just upgrade to 6.4.

Eugene Grosbein



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081202154134.GA73002>