Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 14 Oct 2001 01:48:46 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com>
To:        =?X-UNKNOWN?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@freebsd.dk>
Cc:        Jordan Hubbard <jkh@FreeBSD.ORG>, jrossiter@symantec.com, sos@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Severe I/O Problems
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0110140146280.4910-100000@beppo>
In-Reply-To: <200110140750.f9E7oZi05487@freebsd.dk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > All parameters were not totally lab controlled, but pretty close. I'd call it
> > significant enough that I'll leave WC off for this machine.
> 
> Well I tried something semilar here, CVS tree on one disk, then newfs and
> cvs co src on another (both DTLA's on via686b if that matters) to keep
> things as equal as possible, singleuser mode of cause...
> 
> -SU: softupdates -wc writecache enabled -tags tagged queing enabled
> 
> res:		33.973u 19.425s 27:27.88 3.2%	583+7328k 47219+160828io 37pf+0w
> res-SU:		33.552u 16.235s 9:53.49 8.3%	586+7244k 47180+864io 6pf+0w
> res-wc:		32.959u 20.104s 3:38.23 24.3%	586+7317k 47232+160828io 37pf+0w
> res-wc-SU:	33.343u 16.909s 2:52.81 29.0%	585+7269k 47184+863io 6pf+0w
> res-wc-tags:	33.891u 29.705s 3:40.62 28.8%	587+7595k 47225+160548io 20pf+0w
> res-wc-tags-SU:	33.946u 20.759s 2:48.97 32.3%	578+7234k 47183+863io 5pf+0w
> 
> That behaves more or less as I would expect...
> 
> It is worth nothing that there is close to an order of magnitude in
> difference from the slowest to the fastest, and that WC is the single
> option that can make that difference on its own...
> 

I don't doubt this. I just would suggest that there is such a spread of h/w
and configurations that sometimes turning on WC is fantastic, and sometimes
not so fantastic.

Now- before y'all get huffy about this and suggest that I don't have the right
h/w- I'll agree- but when people run into performance issues this is certainly
one thing to check.

D'ya think you could come up with a little tester program that could predict
whether WC would make sense for a particular h/w configuration or not? That'd
be darned usefull.

-matt



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0110140146280.4910-100000>