Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:47:51 -1000 From: Jonathon Wright <jonathon.s.wright@gmail.com> To: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> Cc: "freebsd-security@freebsd.org" <freebsd-security@freebsd.org>, John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com>, Guy Helmer <guy.helmer@gmail.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Transient Memory problem? Message-ID: <CAGX1DMaONPyJ=5yiu%2BFGxa6Q_9WK4hzht7MF5K2%2BCzMWrpfYbg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201309130040.SAA28208@mail.lariat.net> References: <CAGX1DMbQP=TggYQm-3hra0Od3gjgz5xQ8bEMMrueuhL6kuZMUA@mail.gmail.com> <20130912053559.GF68682@funkthat.com> <979901F9-5F25-4DF1-95A8-32473C55B25F@gmail.com> <52320144.2090807@freebsd.org> <CAGX1DMYAheUAV_eB4Z4R_YaMDx_LzrepEag5KyBC=EOxzhUiMQ@mail.gmail.com> <EC4378DB-3AF0-40F7-98BC-0FE6D318938E@gmail.com> <CAGX1DMY=bSpOkzHT=4mYVfSb_tUR6TVTwZqnUcNM-ORa-GBsRg@mail.gmail.com> <201309130040.SAA28208@mail.lariat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thanks Brett, That item just made it to the top of the argument list I'm formulating right now from everyone's input. =) That makes a very strong argument for the OS as "approved". On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> wrote: > One other point of possible interest which points out how silly > this whole thing is. > > While the NIAP Web site does not list FreeBSD as a "compliant" > operating system product, it lists Juniper routers, which run an > embedded version of FreeBSD, as compliant. See > > https://www.niap-ccevs.org/**CCEVS_Products/pcl.cfm?tech_**name=Router<https://www.niap-ccevs.org/CCEVS_Products/pcl.cfm?tech_name=Router>; > > There may be other products which have "FreeBSD inside" on their > list as well. > > --Brett Glass > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGX1DMaONPyJ=5yiu%2BFGxa6Q_9WK4hzht7MF5K2%2BCzMWrpfYbg>