Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 15:28:26 -0700 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@adamw.org> To: Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com Cc: gahr@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r484872 - head/mail/neomutt Message-ID: <CAP7rwcirw8X1r8JEhxo=HUPis0OE6dHhVmoO7mVdTowhzNj=OQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201811131754.wADHsU1R085629@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <gahr@FreeBSD.org> <201811131059.wADAxKfx094892@repo.freebsd.org> <201811131754.wADHsU1R085629@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:54 AM Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> wrote: > > In message <201811131059.wADAxKfx094892@repo.freebsd.org>, Pietro > Cerutti write > s: > > Author: gahr > > Date: Tue Nov 13 10:59:19 2018 > > New Revision: 484872 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/484872 > > > > Log: > > mail/neomutt: add support for GSSAPI, by default using krb from base > > > > Approved by: bapt > > > > Modified: > > head/mail/neomutt/Makefile > > > > Modified: head/mail/neomutt/Makefile > > ============================================================================= > > = > > --- head/mail/neomutt/Makefile Tue Nov 13 10:53:03 2018 (r48487 > > 1) > > +++ head/mail/neomutt/Makefile Tue Nov 13 10:59:19 2018 (r48487 > > 2) > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ > > > > PORTNAME= neomutt > > PORTVERSION= 20180716 > > -PORTREVISION= 1 > > +PORTREVISION= 2 > > DISTVERSIONPREFIX= ${PORTNAME}- > > CATEGORIES= mail > > > > @@ -26,11 +26,12 @@ OPTIONS_SUB= yes > > SHEBANG_FILES= contrib/smime_keys > > > > OPTIONS_DEFINE= NLS DOCS SASL IDN FLOCK GPGME NOTMUCH > > -OPTIONS_DEFAULT=SASL TOKYOCABINET NOTMUCH GPGME LMDB NCURSES > > +OPTIONS_DEFAULT=SASL TOKYOCABINET NOTMUCH GPGME LMDB NCURSES GSSAPI_BASE > > One of my todos, which I'm currently working on, during the first step > of replacing Heimdal in base with MIT is to make kerberos in base > private. Nothing will be able to link to it. I've been working through > and fixed all ports issues identified by an exp-run (though openssl111 > has given me more work). Which would you like to have as a default in a > post private kerberos base world? (I've tentatively set it to MIT in my > git tree.) If FreeBSD is choosing MIT over Heimdal in base, then it seems to me that we should choose MIT over Heimdal in ports, no? # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAP7rwcirw8X1r8JEhxo=HUPis0OE6dHhVmoO7mVdTowhzNj=OQ>