Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 May 1998 22:16:00 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Bill/Carolyn Pechter <pechter@shell.monmouth.com>
To:        grog@lemis.com (Greg Lehey)
Cc:        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: UNIX 96 (was: Internet Exploder inseparable from Windows?)
Message-ID:  <199805140216.WAA00168@shell.monmouth.com>
In-Reply-To: <19980514083724.E3535@freebie.lemis.com> from "Greg Lehey" at May 14, 98 08:37:24 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> 
> On Wed, 13 May 1998 at 14:22:34 -0700, Studded wrote:
> > Dennis Reiter wrote:
> >>
> >> You mean Microsoft hasn't claimed "Unix" as it's own and
> >> changed it's meaning?
> >
> > 	Actually I heard from a reliable source that MS sought and received
> > "unix" certification for NT from whichever group owns the trademark this
> > week.
> 
> It's been that way for a long time.  UNIX 95%.  Trick question: which
> of these operating systems may *not* be called UNIX 95%?
> 
>   FreeBSD
>   IBM OS/390 (formerly MVS)
>   Microsoft Windows NT
>   System V
> 
> Hint: only one of them may not.
> 
> Greg

I know it's FreeBSD... but has WinNT made Unix95 certification?
is my old SVR2 Unix95?

Bill

+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Bill/Carolyn Pechter | 17 Meredith Drive | Tinton Falls, New Jersey 07724 |
| 908-389-3592 |  Save computing history, give an old geek old hardware.    |
| pechter@shell.monmouth.com                                                |
+---------------------------------------------------------------------------+

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805140216.WAA00168>