Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:34:20 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Koop Mast <kwm@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.gstreamer.mk ports/devel/gstreamer-plugins-gconf Makefilepkg-plist Message-ID: <423DB41C.1020603@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <1111338375.1434.11.camel@heater.rainbow-runner.nl> References: <200503201601.j2KG1gXb019071@repoman.freebsd.org> <423DA870.7070702@FreeBSD.org> <1111338375.1434.11.camel@heater.rainbow-runner.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Koop Mast wrote: > Op zo, 20-03-2005 te 11:44 -0500, schreef Adam Weinberger: > >>Koop Mast wrote: >> >>>kwm 2005-03-20 16:01:42 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> Mk bsd.gstreamer.mk >>> multimedia/gstreamer-plugins Makefile Makefile.common >>> pkg-plist >>> Added files: >>> devel/gstreamer-plugins-gconf Makefile >>> Log: >>> Slit off gstreamer gconf stuff in a seperate port. >>> >>> Requested by: lofi >>> Approved by: maintainer (implicit) >> >>Why? >> >>Is this separation for the benefit of KDE ports, for when KDE has >>support for gstreamer backend? > > > Primarily yes. I think I had another Reason but I can't remember. > > >>Also, does this need to be set manually, or could it just be inferred? > > > This I something that also entered my brain when I hit commit. > Its enabled by USE_GSTREAMER=gconf. > > To be honest I have no idea what inferred in this context means. What I was getting at is that if a port has a dependency on gstreamer-plugins, and a dependency on gconf, the dependency on gstreamer-plugins-gconf should be implied. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?423DB41C.1020603>