Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 13:12:24 -0400 From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to increase TCP and UDP buffers (for IPv4/IPv6) Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20011004130347.04a295a0@marble.sentex.ca> In-Reply-To: <200110041700.f94H0ZQ45166@iguana.aciri.org> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20011004122716.0408d470@marble.sentex.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 10:00 AM 10/4/01 -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > I guess in my case, the load average is general 0.00, but that is just > > measuring userland activity no ? Is there a way to allocate more CPU to > >yes... "top" should tell you how much time you spend in kernel space, >though, and that could be an indication. Strange, its idle as well. top is the most active process, and the interrupts are at about 10% at the max. > > dont think I can implement fast_forwarding-- or am I thinking of something > > else? > >fast_forwarding helps in the sense that it bypasses the queue and >calls directly ip_input at interrupt time. The fact that it also >uses a cache for routes is only an optimization. > >I am not sure how bad would it be to add code for full route lookups >in ipflow_fastforwarding, i might try and have a look at this >in a week or two once i am done with some (partly related) >work i am doing. Hmmm... Do you think I should enable it ? Will it hurt in my case for the large routing table ? Thanks again! ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5.1.0.14.0.20011004130347.04a295a0>