Date: Thu, 4 Jun 1998 13:16:23 +0200 From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@plutotech.com> Cc: gibbs@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Matt Behrens: Re: kernel compile problem Message-ID: <19980604131623.26110@follo.net> In-Reply-To: <20509.896942218@time.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 11:36:58PM -0700 References: <199806040448.WAA03377@pluto.plutotech.com> <20509.896942218@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 11:36:58PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > I think you're over reacting. If you don't think so, have a cup of coffee, > > sit down, and figure out how to fix our config dependency instead of > > whining about my particular change. > > Hmph. OK, Mr. smarty pants, I might just do that. :) I posted (very preliminary, that is - untested) patches to build the kernel as part of 'buildworld' to -current three days ago. This would solve part of the problem. We also have changes in -current to make config whine when it need to be re-compiled - if they're brought to -stable, it should also lower the support load. Are -current config required to be able to config -stable, or is this capability just an accident? I'm discussing some changes with rkw, and knowing whether this is an invariant would be very useful :-) Eivind. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980604131623.26110>