Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 14:03:40 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans) Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, terry@lambert.org, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, jez@netcraft.co.uk Subject: Re: Hard Link Count too small! Message-ID: <199703102103.OAA23487@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <199703080434.PAA09045@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at Mar 8, 97 03:34:38 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >> I have some POSIX performance tests that do this several times. They > >> take too long. They take much too long if the filesystem is not async > >> mounted. > > > >They must not be very POSIX dependent, or they would fail from the > >"shall mark for update"/"shall update" discrepancies introduced by > >the async mount. An async mounted FS is not POSIX compliant. An > > Wrong. "SHALL BE UPDATED". Not "SHALL BE WRITTEN TO CACHE AND MAYBE UPDATED SOMETIME". Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199703102103.OAA23487>