Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2003 22:53:23 +0300 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: james_mapson@museum.rain.com Cc: Hans Lambermont <hans@lambermont.dyndns.org>, "" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: Partial kernel log lines in security output Message-ID: <20030112223906.M48603@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20030112100418.A31931@ns.museum.rain.com> References: <20030111164213.A29112@ns.museum.rain.com> <20030112060118.GF34100@moya.lambermont.dyndns.org> <20030112142010.Y21458@woozle.rinet.ru> <20030112100418.A31931@ns.museum.rain.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 12 Jan 2003, James Long wrote: JL> > It's a cruft from rotating kernel messages buffer, usually sourced from "ipfw JL> > deny log" ipfw statements, which explode kernel message buffer. Harmless, JL> > usually, though. JL> JL> Still, I cringe each time I have to tell someone that, for example, JL> the "file system full" message they're pointing to is "just a bug." JL> JL> This has existed for a long time, in my experience (> 1yr), but perhaps JL> no one has yet filed a PR on it. You know, it's very easy to report, but much harder to fix (at least _properly). And, moreover, Report-only PRs are taken with much less enthusiasm comparing with ones with real solutions ;-) Sidenote: I'm unfortunately out of useful ideas, except the very simple: one may skip 1st line of both saved and current dmesg (via, for example, `tail +2') before comparing... Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030112223906.M48603>