Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 02:26:19 +0900 From: JINMEI Tatuya / =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCP0BMQEMjOkgbKEI=?= <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> To: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ICMP6 redirect rejected; not equal to gw-for-src Message-ID: <y7vk8cdr2h0.wl@condor.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> In-Reply-To: In your message of "Fri, 15 Sep 2000 11:49:36 -0500" <20000915114936.E7599@hamlet.nectar.com> References: <20000914201817.A1041@spawn.nectar.com> <y7v1yymru90.wl@condor.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> <20000915075559.A6743@hamlet.nectar.com> <y7vu2bhr4f5.wl@condor.isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp> <20000915114936.E7599@hamlet.nectar.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 11:49:36 -0500, >>>>> "Jacques A. Vidrine" <n@nectar.com> said: >> How did you configure the site-local address? > rtsol on ophelia; prefix on spawn (via ipv6_prefix_an0="fec0:2" in > /etc/rc.conf). >> It is very strange that >> the routing table has a routing entry corresponding to the site-local >> address with another node as the gateway: > Could a misfunction card cause this? Not sure, but one possibility is that the entry was installed via a routing daemon (e.g. route6d). So, if you have time, could you try the same configuration without any (IPv6) routing daemons? Does the entry still exist? JINMEI, Tatuya Communication Platform Lab. Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp. jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?y7vk8cdr2h0.wl>