Date: Sun, 6 Sep 1998 20:51:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob <mjacob@feral.com> To: Chris Csanady <ccsanady@friley-185-114.res.iastate.edu> Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CAM device naming.. Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.02.9809062049180.2392-100000@feral-gw> In-Reply-To: <199809070340.WAA12543@friley-185-114.res.iastate.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 6 Sep 1998, Chris Csanady wrote: > As the device naming is different in CAM anyways, would there be any > possibility of taking it one step further? I have found it to be > quite nice in other OS's that actually use subdirectories for disk > names, terminals, etc. It makes /dev a much cleaner place imho. > > Also, I would love for the names to actually be based upon the > scsi controller, id, lun, partition etc.. although, I suppose there > is no way in hell this will happen. :P It sucks when a disk goes > away, and then every last entry in your fstab is incorrect though. In a multipathing environment this is not right. It has no meaning on fibre fabrics. I really strongly suggest that leaving the names the way they are right now is fine until a suitable volume binder exists. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.02.9809062049180.2392-100000>