Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:00:47 +0100 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS on AMD64 - any recent crashes? Message-ID: <flrfi6$v7g$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <200801062130.40755.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> References: <flr6fm$27c$1@ger.gmane.org> <200801062130.40755.peter.schuller@infidyne.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig5A55C2134572116F91A85FF5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Peter Schuller wrote: >> In light of the recent discussion about ZFS stability, does anyone sti= ll >> have kmem_map_too_small panics on AMD64 after tuning it (as presented = in >> http://wiki.freebsd.org/ZFSTuningGuide)? >=20 > Not sure if you wanted negatives, but I have not seen such crashes on a= ny of=20 All reports are welcome :) > the three amd64 systems I'm running ZFS on (3 gb, 4 gb and 4 gb of RAM)= =2E The=20 > only tuning done is to increase the kmem size and arc_max and disabling= =20 > prefetch. The increase in kmem was not to avoid crashes, but was to=20 > accomodate the larger arc_max chosen. This is somewhat a special case - you also did tuning besides kmem size. = I'm especially interested in this, hoping to gather the "combination=20 that works" from the reports. --------------enig5A55C2134572116F91A85FF5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHgUGFldnAQVacBcgRAo9eAKDcTZ82c+08ijQwHhqI6tjp3Oc2oACg+0Yr Rqf+7GZZVMSm7o/llxHdJsA= =EO+h -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig5A55C2134572116F91A85FF5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?flrfi6$v7g$1>