Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 15 May 1999 10:44:21 +1200
From:      "Dan Langille" <junkmale@xtra.co.nz>
To:        Wham Bang <wham_bang@yahoo.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: IP Filter vrs ipfw+natd
Message-ID:  <19990514224632.NUQ7623210.mta2-rme@wocker>
In-Reply-To: <19990514211423.25890.rocketmail@web106.yahoomail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<color><param>0100,0100,0100</param><FontFamily><param>Courier New</param>On 14 May 99, at 14:14, Wham Bang wrote:


<italic><color><param>0000,0000,FF00</param>> So I'm a little confused.  I think I'd rather use IP Filter, but

> I can't even find clear instructions on building a 3.1 kernel

> with it enabled...


</italic></color>The FreeBSD Diary doesn't have an article dealing soley with 3.* and 
ipfilter.  Not that it is of any help to you now, but one is planned for 
the near future as I'm about to put together another box.


But for the meantime, I've looked at my notes at 
http://www.freebsddiary.org/freebsd/upgrade31.htm under the heading "2 
March 6:42 am" (or just search for ipfilter).  And the following is not 
guaranteed to work, but it's my gut feeling:


You don't need any special kernel options.  The ipfilter install process 
will take care of that for you.


Then skip down to "3 March 5:17 pm" where I compile ipfilter:


[/usr/src/sys/i386/conf] # config IPFILTER3    // this is my kernel

[/usr/src/sys/i386/conf] # cd /usr/ports/net/ipfilter

[/usr/ports/net/ipfilter] # make freebsd30

[/usr/ports/net/ipfilter] # make install-bsd

[/usr/ports/net/ipfilter] # FreeBSD-2.2/kinstall


<FontFamily><param>Arial</param>>  Does anyone have any advice to offer on

<italic><color><param>0000,0000,FF00</param><FontFamily><param>Courier New</param>> IP Filter versus ipfw and natd?


</italic></color><FontFamily><param>Arial</param>I like IP Filter because it seems to be more robust and feature rich.  In my opinion, it's 

far more than the average user needs at home.  But I'm using it anyway.  I think it's more

suited to sites with high traffic volumes and comple rule sets.  But I'm using it anyway.<italic><color><param>0000,0000,FF00</param><FontFamily><param>Courier New</param>


</italic></color><FontFamily><param>Arial</param>>  Is there some reason that

<italic><color><param>0000,0000,FF00</param><FontFamily><param>Courier New</param>> there's so much documentation on ipfw and natd compared to

> the IP Filter stuff?


</italic></color><FontFamily><param>Arial</param>I've heard someone say the IPFilter author doesn't do much documentation.  As for 

writing something, is that you I hear volunteering?  Sounds like a good way to get 

started with a FreeBSD project.  <<grin>

--
Dan Langille - DVL Software Limited
The FreeBSD Diary     - http://www.FreeBSDDiary.org/freebsd/
NZ FreeBSD User Group - http://www.nzfug.nz.freebsd.org/
The Racing System     - http://www.racingsystem.com/racingsystem.htm


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990514224632.NUQ7623210.mta2-rme>