Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 10:22:33 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options src/sys/i386/acpica Makefile acpi_wakecode.S src/sys/i386/conf NOTES Message-ID: <20031030102144.L89089@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20031029.234108.97396294.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <20031029.222828.133432192.imp@bsdimp.com> <3FA0A683.40108@freebsd.org><20031029.234108.97396294.imp@bsdimp.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20031029.232311.115991039.imp@bsdimp.com> > M. Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> writes: > : The "general silliness of compiling SMP for all modules" was a design > : decision for SMPng made a long time ago. That's why there's no longer > : a SMP kernel option. > > Actually, I'm smoking crack here. Forget I said it. > > We do, however, don't use the lock prefix on UP kernels. Instead, > modules call the atomic functions, rather than inlining them. Whatever you smoke, the bounty is now up to $40, thanks to another donor. Let's see some code! -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031030102144.L89089>