Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:11:38 -0800
From:      Joshua Tinnin <krinklyfig@spymac.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc:        Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr>
Subject:   Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not...
Message-ID:  <200502151611.39053.krinklyfig@spymac.com>
In-Reply-To: <1722947768.20050215023424@wanadoo.fr>
References:  <20050213152331.2B00E16A4D1@hub.freebsd.org> <F64CC038-7EEE-11D9-B357-000D93C7878E@illusionart.com> <1722947768.20050215023424@wanadoo.fr>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Monday 14 February 2005 05:34 pm, Anthony Atkielski 
<atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> Vonleigh Simmons writes:
> > If you need to run explorer to access a website, someone should be
> > fired. Standards compliance is a good thing.
>
> MSIE has traditionally followed HTML standards more closely than
> almost any other browser.

Absolutely untrue. Please stop saying this, as it's false.

- jt

> Webmasters should probably be replaced if they design an open Web
> site for any _specific_ browser.  Internal web sites are a different
> story.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200502151611.39053.krinklyfig>