Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 22:02:17 +0100 From: Joel Dahl <joel@FreeBSD.org> To: Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl> Cc: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net>, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG, John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, doc-committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors contrib.committers.sgml contrib.develalumni.sgml Message-ID: <1139605337.954.32.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> In-Reply-To: <20060210203653.GA9307@freebie.xs4all.nl> References: <200602091800.k19I0gHR024988@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060210171224.GI21499@submonkey.net> <1139592139.790.7.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <200602101235.54875.jhb@freebsd.org> <1139594811.954.14.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <20060210181249.GA949@flame.pc> <1139603433.954.29.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <20060210203653.GA9307@freebie.xs4all.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 21:36 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 09:30:33PM +0100, Joel Dahl wrote.. > > On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 20:12 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > On 2006-02-10 19:06, Joel Dahl <joel@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > >> You can use common sense though. He was obviously a ports committer. > > > > > > > > Guys, I'm lost. What are we arguing about? > > > > > > > > He was a ports committer, but I fail to see how that is important since > > > > the Development Team Alumni doesn't differentiate between different > > > > types of commit bits? > > > > > > > > Maybe I was a bit unclear with the meaning of the "unclassified commit > > > > bit" comment; it's just a reminder, since they're still in our access > > > > files. :-) > > > > > > No arguing from me. I mentioned he was the ports-meister, just in > > > case the `unclassified' comment was meant to be a reminder of ``we > > > don't know what this guy was working on''. > > > > > > It's obvious that the comment is not, since it only mentions names > > > listed in access.unclassified, so there's nothing to argue about. > > > > Yep, everyone who is in access.unclassified has the "unclassified commit > > bit" comment next to their name in the SGML source, but I can understand > > if some people were confused by the "unclassified" discussion, > > especially if they believed that asami was the only one who had that > > comment next to his name. :-) > > All that said, I would think that as a matter of principle > access.unclassified should be an empty file. Agreed. -- Joel - joel at FreeBSD dot org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1139605337.954.32.camel>