Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 12:29:25 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl> To: Doug Barton <DougB@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: cvs commit: ports/Mk bsd.port.mk] Message-ID: <20020619122925.C552@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> In-Reply-To: <3D104BFF.A0E6071@FreeBSD.org>; from DougB@freebsd.org on Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 02:16:47AM -0700 References: <3D104BFF.A0E6071@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Jun 19, 2002 at 02:16:47AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > I would have thought that the entire discussion about not using > reinplace when it isn't needed would have at least slowed you down long > enough to think about why having to install a complete program just to > handle regular expressions in ports makefiles is a bad idea. Obviously I > was wrong.=20 >=20 > Am I actually the only one who thinks this has gotten totally out of > control?=20 FWIW, I also don't think its a good idea, but I don't see any other solutio= n. At least the sed changes should be MFC'd so that -STABLE users won't have to have the sed_reinplace port installed. Has anyone actually produced statistics on the number of ports that have sed-incompatible regexps? --Stijn --=20 I really hate this damned machine I wish that they would sell it. It never does quite what I want But only what I tell it. --St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE9EF0FY3r/tLQmfWcRAvmEAJ0cWx539voxi8AKULnmZudA7/m+pgCglE0n 89s37uqIyKjS5fH9w5WUJuE= =wNjA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --St7VIuEGZ6dlpu13-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020619122925.C552>