Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2008 01:19:57 -0500 From: dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: root /etc/csh Message-ID: <20081115061957.GA10998@ourbrains.org> In-Reply-To: <4918CE42.3050504@ccstores.com> References: <20081110110805.GK1302@obspm.fr> <20081110161002.GA81960@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20081110203643.GH27646@obspm.fr> <200811102235.46971.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0811102239200.846@hmacs.cmi.ua.ac.be> <4ad871310811101530p7b2baa0fk7f7b5118e314c11d@mail.gmail.com> <4918CE42.3050504@ccstores.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> isn't the "main reason" because other shells may reside on a filesystem > which isn't necessarily mounted in maintenance/single user mode? Or, libraries > for the same? > -- > Jim Pazarena fquest@ccstores.com Just link the shell of your choice statically and put it somewhere in /. Problem solved. Why doesn't FreeBSD ship bash and other shells besides the `sh' linked statically is beyond me. It wouldn't break ports, would it?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081115061957.GA10998>