Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 17:41:43 +0100 From: Andreas Nilsson <andrnils@gmail.com> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> Cc: Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn@gmail.com>, Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com>, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mesa-dri uses llvm60 Message-ID: <CAPS9%2BStXTJgwNcp%2BANpW6WZN0sq9E8yqEpr3MAUTAQL3g0iKtw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.64.1901121108520.13279@sea.ntplx.net> References: <23609.9020.600859.127925@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20190112101010.2ebfb955@ernst.home> <23609.58491.10199.676646@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <CAPS9%2BStGXBokDFG38kW26xbux4vW8Aa=_W_POYD9RfPe_WufSw@mail.gmail.com> <23609.60774.88807.167712@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <20190112150932.6a70784b@ernst.home> <Pine.GSO.4.64.1901121108520.13279@sea.ntplx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 5:25 PM Daniel Eischen <deischen@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > On Sat, 12 Jan 2019 08:36:38 -0500 > > Robert Huff <roberthuff@rcn.com> wrote: > > > >> Andreas Nilsson writes: > >> > >>> As far as I know full llvm is needed ( or at least used to be ) > >>> because the one in base is missing a few key pieces used for > >>> mesa-dri. > >> > >> Aha! > >> > > > > Right, it needs at least llvm-config, which is not in base. Pity. > > Just thinking out loud, can the missing llvm bits be a port, > such that building the missing pieces use what's already > in base? > > -- > DE > It probably could, at least technically. But it would probably not be a good idea, having some bits in / and some bits in /usr/local . Also, if a newer mesa-dri would depend on a newer llvm than whats in base, that would prohibit any update to mesa-dri. /A
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAPS9%2BStXTJgwNcp%2BANpW6WZN0sq9E8yqEpr3MAUTAQL3g0iKtw>