Date: Mon, 16 Dec 1996 15:53:12 -0700 (MST) From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org> To: phk@critter.tfs.com (Poul-Henning Kamp) Cc: peter@spinner.DIALix.COM, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Plan for integrating Secure RPC -- comments wanted Message-ID: <199612162253.PAA02252@phaeton.artisoft.com> In-Reply-To: <12325.850754402@critter.tfs.com> from "Poul-Henning Kamp" at Dec 16, 96 05:40:02 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >Why don't we just give in and make a dual-mode libcrypt with the > >exportable des one-way hash code like all the other vendors are doing? > >(and of course, the MD5 hash code) > > I'm game. Although this doesn't solve the problem with /bin/ed and > other legitimate users of DES, secure RPC for instance. Heh. "Making RPC calls the government can't read is not legitimate use". Terry Lambert terry@lambert.org --- Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present or previous employers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199612162253.PAA02252>