Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 16:41:20 -0700 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> Cc: FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: timed restoral until deleter makes a port Message-ID: <CANCZdfqG7aKVov3NDi6gY0YSFvMjoB0QcBUxabYghE4rGcDg6w@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201901242311.x0ONAn1e052387@fire.js.berklix.net> References: <201901242311.x0ONAn1e052387@fire.js.berklix.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:13 PM Julian H. Stacey <jhs@berklix.com> wrote: > Current box here is now about 10 seconds ahead, since timed was deleted, > still waiting for the code vandal who removed timed from src/ > without proper discussion in advance, to move timed from src/ to ports/ > > timed absence will bite more people when 13 is released. timed > should be restored to src/ until the code vandal is forced to write > a ports/ entry. Temporary removal of the src/ commit bit could encourage > this & admonish irresponsible conduct. > > The tech issues have been discussed before, no need to repeat, > this is just a question of enforcing responsible procedure. > The ball is in my court to approve a pull request so we can finish the port. We have plenty of time before 13 and current, is after all, current. So there's no need to do anything rash here. I think all the rest of this is without merit and an overreaction. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfqG7aKVov3NDi6gY0YSFvMjoB0QcBUxabYghE4rGcDg6w>