Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2000 19:51:10 +0200 From: Alexander Langer <alex@big.endian.de> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> Cc: Michael Chin-Yuan Wu <keichii@peorth.iteration.net>, freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Procmail Filter for FreeBSD Mailing Lists and such Message-ID: <20000429195110.A10609@cichlids.cichlids.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpitx1qf02.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@flood.ping.uio.no on Sat, Apr 29, 2000 at 02:16:13PM %2B0200 References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0004282112250.30997-200000@peorth.iteration.net> <20000429115841.A2965@cichlids.cichlids.com> <xzpitx1qf02.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Thus spake Dag-Erling Smorgrav (des@flood.ping.uio.no):
> It won't work for people who use QMail or Postfix, because they set
No. I use Postfix myself. It set's an _additional_ Delivered-To:, it
doesn't replace the former.
Received: from baerenklau.de.freebsd.org (baerenklau.de.freebsd.org
+[195.185.195.14])
by manta.mayn.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D196E9B003
for <alex@big.endian.de>; Sat, 29 Apr 2000 15:13:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.18])
by baerenklau.de.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA01863;
Sat, 29 Apr 2000 14:17:55 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG)
But the thing in question is not Sender/Delivered-To, but the use of
procmails split-rules, which DO own ;-)
Alex
--
I need a new ~/.sig.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000429195110.A10609>