Date: Sun, 7 Apr 1996 12:45:49 -0400 (EDT) From: "Engineer, 08.ZIYA" <shyone@constantchange.on.ca> To: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Cc: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, terry@lambert.org, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: BSDI binaries Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960407124259.5221A-100000@dreamlabs.dreaming.org> In-Reply-To: <199604070044.KAA05283@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 7 Apr 1996, Michael Smith wrote: > If you get a 'good' -current, it'll usually be fine, it's just that quite > often you get one that's not so good, and then you end up with a machine that > hangs or eats your filesystems (rare) or whatever. -current is good if > you're working on FreeBSD, but if you're working on other things and > want a stable platform to do your work on, -stable is a better bet. > I run -current in order to learn things. I like it when it breaks... i try and track it down, or follow the lists to watch the progress and how it is solved. For stability, i have my boring -stable machine over there in the corner. :) Waiting patiently for 2.2, Mit %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % ShyOne | Mitayai % % Engineer | Project Co-ordinator % % 08.ZIYA | DreamLabs % % shyone@constantchange.on.ca | mitayai@dreaming.org % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.91.960407124259.5221A-100000>