Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 28 Apr 2003 09:48:46 -0500
From:      "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-current-local@be-well.no-ip.com>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Somethings still up with new NSS?
Message-ID:  <20030428144846.GA29465@madman.celabo.org>
In-Reply-To: <44n0iallyq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>
References:  <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428190209.A21656@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428080505.GA1474@chihiro.leafy.idv.tw> <20030428075916.GA53857@myhakas.internal> <20030428105521.GB2676@madman.celabo.org> <20030428111859.GA2923@madman.celabo.org> <44n0iallyq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Apr 28, 2003 at 10:45:33AM -0400, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
> "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@freebsd.org> writes:
> 
> > So until I add logic to pwd_mkdb(8) to recognize and deal
> > appropriately with this situation, it is best to run pwd_mkdb once
> > manually after the NSS commit.
> 
> Wouldn't an easy solution be to put a comment into master.passwd
> itself?  It can serve as a warning, and it will change the CVS tag
> (thus, mergemaster will offer to rebuild the database after a proper
> merge).  

I don't think this would give very good coverage ... usually one does
not merge master.passwd.  Clever thought, nonetheless.

Anyway, I've already committed a workaround to pwd_mkdb.

Cheers,
-- 
Jacques Vidrine   . NTT/Verio SME      . FreeBSD UNIX       . Heimdal
nectar@celabo.org . jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@freebsd.org . nectar@kth.se



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030428144846.GA29465>