Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:58:10 -0600 From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> To: Pete Fritchman <petef@absolutbsd.org> Cc: <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Ports using SSL & ipv6 by default (was: Re: ports/47257: [update port] irc/ezbounce) Message-ID: <BA5194D2.23F97%ade@lovett.com> In-Reply-To: <20030120164157.GC9751@absolutbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/20/03 10:41, "Pete Fritchman" <petef@absolutbsd.org> wrote: > ++ 20/01/03 17:10 +0100 - Simon 'corecode' Schubert: > | how about defaulting to SSL? this is a generic question, not only > | specific to this port. i'd vote for default-ssl and default-ipv6 because > | both are well supported in the base system. > | porters, portmgr, comments? > > I like it, I don't see why not (since, like you said, SSL and ipv6 are > both in the base system). If people don't want them, they can always > just add the appropriate WITHOUT_* knobs to make.conf. Unfortunately, you're assuming that all ports honor WITHOUT_SSL and WITHOUT_IPV6. They don't :( Looking at a pretty big tree-sweep to fix it, as well. Defaulting SSL on I can understand, but not IPv6 -- there's lots and lots of IPv4-only machines out there, which have no intention of using IPv6 anytime soon. -aDe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BA5194D2.23F97%ade>