Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:45:47 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Max Laier <max@love2party.net> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: What do people think about not installing a stripped /kernel ?] Message-ID: <20041020194547.GD2195@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <200410201913.42879.max@love2party.net> References: <41767CF1.2020005@FreeBSD.org> <20041020.105839.100358845.imp@bsdimp.com> <20041020170907.GA1216@orion.daedalusnetworks.priv> <200410201913.42879.max@love2party.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--DrWhICOqskFTAXiy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Oct 20, 2004 at 07:13:35PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > Why is this discussion ongoing? The consensus seems pretty clear: "Implem= ent=20 > it, but have a make.conf option to turn it off." If there is concern with= =20 > this make if default to off and have an option to turn it on. >=20 Implementing this is very easy, since it's already implemented, just not by default. What everyone seem to have forgotten is that we also have modules, and in the "config -g" case, we also build debug versions of the modules. And if we're also going to install modules with debug symbols, I think this puts the requirement for the root file system way beyond the rational limits. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --DrWhICOqskFTAXiy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBdsBrqRfpzJluFF4RAsQXAJ4vqENfrkv3w/U5Q/9yXpFqD1JOYwCbByWV t183DjnuzwJwVO8XuyOhCSM= =ycNH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DrWhICOqskFTAXiy--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041020194547.GD2195>