Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 16:01:34 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/chinese/BBMan Makefile ports/chinese/CJK Makefile ports/chinese/arnettf Makefile ports/chinese/arphicttf Makefile ports/chinese/auto-tw-l10n Makefile ports/chinese/bg5pdf Makefile ports/chinese/big5fs Makefile ports/chinese/chinput3 ... Message-ID: <20050108160134.GR49329@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <2408A9749ABBBCC666386CDE@cc-147.int.t-online.fr> References: <20050108155045.568E716A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> <2408A9749ABBBCC666386CDE@cc-147.int.t-online.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--dvv5THrRrdqidt0E Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 04:58:33PM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +-le 08/01/2005 15:50 +0000, Sergey Matveychuk ?crivait : > | Log: > | - Pass maintainership to submitter >=20 > I fail to see the point of such a commit, I mean, without any update to t= he > ports. Giving a port to someone making an update is good, but giving a wh= ole > bunch of ports just for giving them is doing no good I think. It means that people (and the numerous nag scripts) can contact the correct maintainer, and that PRs don't get assigned to the wrong person. That's plenty reason enough. Ceri --=20 Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.) --dvv5THrRrdqidt0E Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFB4APeocfcwTS3JF8RAl+VAJ9InkhvpsFIGpN7sJEWXKPGOp2RogCdHaZY oRXtTuSTiWuAwsQnp/EI9rw= =w7IS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --dvv5THrRrdqidt0E--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050108160134.GR49329>