Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 20:50:18 -0700 From: Kevin Stevens <Kevin_Stevens@pursued-with.net> To: "Joseph I. Davida" <jd108@pacbell.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: usb to ethernet converter Message-ID: <3E2C2ADF-D6AF-11D7-A2E0-000A959CEE6A@pursued-with.net> In-Reply-To: <3F4981D2.4050906@pacbell.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sunday, Aug 24, 2003, at 20:26 US/Pacific, Joseph I. Davida wrote: > If that is the case, how is it that the > protocol can work over direct connection > to USB port and not over ethernet? > This area needs a little clarification. > All we are changing is the physical interface, > but keeping the rest of the filters, which do > the printer specific conversion to bitmaps > (or whatever that format is) the same. So the > only change would be in the physical connection. Exquisite reasoning. By the same token, an airplane shouldn't need wings, since it's just like a car except for the physical transport medium. > I just need to know more details why it cannot work. Yes, that's clear. Seems you have some studying to do. Good luck! KeS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E2C2ADF-D6AF-11D7-A2E0-000A959CEE6A>