Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 01:00:08 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: hiren panchasara <hiren@strugglingcoder.info> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 11.0 stuck on high network load Message-ID: <20160914220008.GL2840@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <20160914215657.GV9397@strugglingcoder.info> References: <20160904215739.GC22212@zxy.spb.ru> <20160905014612.GA42393@strugglingcoder.info> <20160914213503.GJ2840@zxy.spb.ru> <20160914215657.GV9397@strugglingcoder.info>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:56:57PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > On 09/15/16 at 12:35P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 06:46:12PM -0700, hiren panchasara wrote: > > > > > On 09/05/16 at 12:57P, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > I am try using 11.0 on Dual E5-2620 (no X2APIC). > > > > Under high network load and may be addtional conditional system go to > > > > unresponsible state -- no reaction to network and console (USB IPMI > > > > emulation). INVARIANTS give to high overhad. Is this exist some way to > > > > debug this? > > > > > > Can you panic it from console to get to db> to get backtrace and other > > > info when it goes unresponsive? > > > > ipmi console don't respond (chassis power diag don't react) > > login on sol console stuck on *tcp. > > Also *tcp means its stuck on lock tcp? if so, that'd be lock on > V_tcbinfo. I think? > > tcp_subr.c has tcp_init() which calls > in_pcbinfo_init(&V_tcbinfo, "tcp", &V_tcb, hashsize, hashsize, > "tcp_inpcb", tcp_inpcb_init, NULL, 0, IPI_HASHFIELDS_4TUPLE); > > and "tcp" is the name used to initialise the lock inside > in_pcbinfo_init() with > INP_INFO_LOCK_INIT(pcbinfo, name); > > What exact svn rev are you on? r305117 > Also do you have any local changes? only kerberos related. I am using kerberos and NIS.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160914220008.GL2840>