Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:06:28 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [brooks@one-eyed-alien.net: [PATCH] switching to if_xname] Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0211191305020.84271-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <20021119125107.A16432@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
why is this ent to hackers? it's a -current patch.. should it not be sent to -current or -net? FWIW I see no huge problems.. as you say, it's mechanical changes mostly. On Tue, 19 Nov 2002, Brooks Davis wrote: > On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 10:54:23AM -0800, Brooks Davis wrote: > > I'm trying to get some review for the following patch. I realize it's > > quite large, but most it is is trivial. The ipfw code is the only thing > > that worries me significantly. I have promised Kris that I will fix > > ports that break with this change so you don't need to worry about that > > issue. > > I've uploaded a new version of the patch addressing the concerns I've > heard to: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~brooks/patches/if_xname.diff > > -- Brooks > > -- > Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. > PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0211191305020.84271-100000>