Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 13:31:54 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 244600] dns/knot-resolver: [patch] fix critical cache space pre-allocation failure bug and add rc scripts Message-ID: <bug-244600-7788-JdWvbrGZ3f@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-244600-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-244600-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D244600 --- Comment #5 from Leo Vandewoestijne <freebsd@dns.company> --- Created attachment 216109 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D216109&action= =3Dedit knot-resolver Took a very long time, but I finally have a patch that (hopefully) solves everything addressed here and more. 1. Thanks for the rc.d scripts! I did minor adjustments to them. Only "problem" I still have is being not able to set user/group, but it can= be done in kresd.conf 2. The dns/knot2-lib port is desired by those who wish to have only knot-resolver and not knot2. Consequence of that is that you need to install knot2 before knot-resolver = in case you wish to have both. 5. The `kresd.conf` overwrite problem should be solved using @sample (I hop= e). 6. I have not been able to replicate that exact same error, but clearly sti= ll needs attention. Problem I currently have in getting root.keys is because of missing lua modules. 7. Solved per PR 246578 - Before I remove lua-socket and lua-sec I still encountered errors with cqueues So I've also switched to `luajit` instead of `luajit-openresty` hoping it w= ould maybe help (still needs testing). In ports/dnsdist we switched from luajit luajit-openresty because it was to= ld to be faster, so maybe it better should remain unchanged? - Links in pkg-messages are removed/updated. - The `-Dmanaged_ta=3Denabled` issue got it's own knob also, hope it allows= you to run as desired - but to me looks not OK yet. Further also here I removed python as a requirement; I get 2 GB of software just to never ever regenerate a few tiny docs. Seems to be fine without. I'm using this patch myself, but please let me know what you think of it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-244600-7788-JdWvbrGZ3f>