Date: Mon, 9 Mar 1998 14:23:27 +1100 (EST) From: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au> To: peter@netplex.com.au (Peter Wemm) Cc: jb@cimlogic.com.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc, just what you need to here right now Message-ID: <199803090323.OAA15438@cimlogic.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199803090312.LAA14528@spinner.netplex.com.au> from Peter Wemm at "Mar 9, 98 11:12:36 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Wemm wrote: > There are some other changes outside the gcc.c area, but I thought I'd > done them in such a way that it wouldn't break anything.. Well, that was > the plan anyway... Believe it or not, I was actually trying not to break > the other arch's much, hence the gymnastics with the #ifdefs rather than > just bashing it as needed for i386. > > What's wrong anyway? Compile or runtime failure? It generates an rdata pseudo-op that gas doesn't recognise. gcc thinks it's doing a wonderful job. gas disagrees. From the glance I took at gas, if I'd configured it for ecoff, it would have known about rdata. But the gas config (I committed the alpha-elf stuff cause it wasn't in the diff I sent jdp, and it doesn't affect i386), declares obj-elf and appears to behave like the NetBSD version of gas (which is what I think I want). I'm happy to leave this until you've completed your aout/elf changes. -- John Birrell - jb@cimlogic.com.au; jb@freebsd.org CIMlogic Pty Ltd, GPO Box 117A, Melbourne Vic 3001, Australia +61 418 353 137 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199803090323.OAA15438>