Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 25 Mar 2001 21:46:58 +0300
From:      Peter Pentchev <roam@orbitel.bg>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Building only a specified list of kernel modules
Message-ID:  <20010325214658.F3241@ringworld.oblivion.bg>
In-Reply-To: <200103251840.f2PIeE973790@harmony.village.org>; from imp@harmony.village.org on Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 11:40:14AM -0700
References:  <20010324211140.C4304@ringworld.oblivion.bg> <200103251840.f2PIeE973790@harmony.village.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Mar 25, 2001 at 11:40:14AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> I object to this patch.  It is needlessly complicated.  It adds too
> many icky knobs to the tree, created duplicate places where you'd need
> lists, etc.

With your patch, if I want any kind of sound support in my kernel,
I still have to compile all the sound drivers.  Same for syscons,
same for netgraph, same for any upcoming 'second-level domain' directory.
Me no like :)

G'luck,
Peter

-- 
If the meanings of 'true' and 'false' were switched, then this sentence wouldn't be false.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010325214658.F3241>