Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 22:05:42 +0300 From: Alexandr Kovalenko <never@nevermind.kiev.ua> To: "Lance M. Westerhoff" <lancew@psu.edu> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Intel Fortran Compiler? Message-ID: <20020712190542.GA42243@nevermind.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <B8600ADA-95C7-11D6-8D75-00039357F10C@psu.edu> References: <20020712183026.GA96409@nevermind.kiev.ua> <B8600ADA-95C7-11D6-8D75-00039357F10C@psu.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello, Lance M. Westerhoff! On Fri, Jul 12, 2002 at 02:46:47PM -0400, you wrote: > Really, I didn't realize that. I figured you wouldn't want to have a > RELEASE at one level and the ports at another. Wouldn't the RELEASE > ports be more stable and bug free then that CURRENT ports? 1. There is no tag for RELENG_4 for ports 2. RELENG_4 is not -RELEASE, but -STABLE 3. Ports have only one branch, which is tag=. 4. Yes, more up-to date ports will work better. > On Friday, July 12, 2002, at 02:30 PM, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > > >Hello, Lance Westerhoff! > > > >On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 03:38:35PM -0400, you wrote: > > > >>Hello All- > >> > >>I notice the following page refers to the availability of an Intel > >>Fortran port, but I can't seem to find it in my /usr/ports (I just > >>updated my ports (tag=RELENG_4) directory, so I must just be missing > >>something. Any insight would be great. > >You shouldn't use tag=RELENG_4 for ports supfile, you should use tag=. > > > >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=37704 > > > >-- > >NEVE-RIPE > >Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group > >http://uafug.org.ua/ > > -- NEVE-RIPE Ukrainian FreeBSD User Group http://uafug.org.ua/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020712190542.GA42243>