Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 20:20:01 +0200 From: Jona Joachim <jaj13@web.de> To: White Hat <pigskin_referee@yahoo.com> Cc: FreeBSD Users Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: solaris Message-ID: <450062D1.4040205@web.de> In-Reply-To: <20060906155419.95441.qmail@web34402.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060906155419.95441.qmail@web34402.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
White Hat wrote: > --- Freminlins <freminlins@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On 06/09/06, White Hat <pigskin_referee@yahoo.com> >> wrote: >>> I have >>> tried Open Office. No matter what anyone says, it >> is >>> just not as full featured as Word 2003. It is not >> even >>> close. >> >> True, but also compare the cost. Not even close... > > Immaterial. the singularly most important feature is > suitability to task. If it is free and it does not > work, what good is it? What feature(s) exactly do you need that OpenOffice doesn't have? In what way is MS Office better concerning this (these) feature(s)? --jona
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?450062D1.4040205>