Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 19:23:31 +0100 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/add Makefile add.h extract.c futil.c main.c perform.c pkg_add.1 src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/create Makefile create.h main.c perform.c pkg_create.1 pl.c src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/delete Makefile delete.h main.c perform.c ... Message-ID: <20040811182331.GW87690@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <A8B65A06-EBB5-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> References: <20040811162405.GV87690@submonkey.net> <A8B65A06-EBB5-11D8-887A-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--sV6E+871crhbObqU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 06:44:05PM +0200, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Ceri Davies wrote: >=20 > >On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 04:16:24PM +0000, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > >>eik 2004-08-11 16:16:24 UTC > >> > >> > >> - replace the perl version of pkg_version(1) by its C equivalent, > >> which means that `pkg_version -c' does no longer work > > > >I don't think that this should have gone into RELENG_4, in this case. >=20 > Maybe. I don't know whether I should have asked re@ first, the MFC was=20 > announced in the commit log and `pkg_version -c' is stupid anyway, so I= =20 > doubt anyone uses it. When you insist I can provide a shell script=20 > providing the same functionality or add it to the C version. I agree that it's stupid; I'm just not sure that removing an option is a good thing at this stage in RELENG_4's life. > The problem with the package tools is that they are strongly tied with=20 > the ports tree, which is the same on -CURRENT and -STABLE, and the new=20 > features are really worth the MFC. And the C version is much faster than= =20 > the perl one. >=20 > Anyway, how do you think we should proceed from here? I'd imagine it's a call for re@ - personally I have no attachment to `pkg_version -c', but wanted to note that this is possibly a bad thing. Cheers, Ceri --=20 It is not tinfoil, it is my new skin. I am a robot. --sV6E+871crhbObqU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBGmQjocfcwTS3JF8RAmeyAJ9K8bNhxxF7RZlIcEa7PIAspBhjogCgg5ap tCPRiq38tdiMXAxxS7UiwCI= =2PAM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sV6E+871crhbObqU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040811182331.GW87690>