Date: Mon, 5 May 1997 22:04:36 +0200 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: bazilio@economic.acnit.ac.ru (Vasily V. Grechishnikov) Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS server and NFS lkm conflicts ? Message-ID: <19970505220436.AR20558@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970505151344.436A-100000@economic.acnit.ac.ru>; from Vasily V. Grechishnikov on May 5, 1997 16:44:41 %2B0400 References: <Pine.BSF.3.91.970505151344.436A-100000@economic.acnit.ac.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Vasily V. Grechishnikov wrote: > I have 2.2R. I need NFS server on my machine. I recompile my > kernel without option NFS and try to use NFS as LKM . At startup (I can't say much to this, i never really tried to use the NFS LKMs.) > And second question: LKM vs. static, what better ? Is LKM > pageable ? All kernel memory is non-pageable. Given your troubles with the LKM, and the fact that you're probably never going to unload it ever again over the lifetime of your system, static is likely better. -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970505220436.AR20558>