Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 20:54:38 +0100 From: RW <fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netcraft do not display uptime graph, why? Message-ID: <20071005205438.52baa49d@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <E50959A61F8DEE75BD1D1717@ganymede.hub.org> References: <1190391196.2346.4.camel@viola.izb.knu.ac.kr> <20070921123624.77365827.wmoran@potentialtech.com> <E50959A61F8DEE75BD1D1717@ganymede.hub.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 16:19:53 -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <freebsd@hub.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > That URL states that we 'default to 1000Hz' ... is it lowerable, and > what are the ramifications of doing so? My first thought is that > 1000Hz is giving us higher timer granularity (1000 cycles per sec vs > 100 cycles per sec) ... is this correct? I think it's more to do with lowering latency on polled network interfaces.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20071005205438.52baa49d>