Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 10:44:51 -0600 (CST) From: "Jake 'Portmaster' Messinger" <jake@portmasters.com> To: Phil Taylor <phil@lansystems.co.uk> Cc: portmaster-users@portmasters.com, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: RE: (PM) Infrastructure Design with Portmasters and FreeBSD/Zebra (long) Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10112201043080.16440-100000@linux2.portmasters.com> In-Reply-To: <6F8544E9B883D21192170000E215549F20FE90@ns1.lansystems.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Phil Taylor wrote: > Just a thought, if you do this I would recommend that you pick a fairly > obscure 192.168 address, not 10.x.x.x as the default subnet mask gives you a > better chance of not using the same subnet as customers local networks, do > NOT pick 10.0.0.x for example as everyone with MS SBS will suffer :-> We DO pick 10.0.0.x and it caused me some probs, but MOST of these NAT router things you buy use 192.168.x.x. However, if its using Nat, it doesnt matter. It only gets you when the local PC has 10.0.0.something, and they have a modem dialing in on that PC and ALSO getting 10.0.0. something. You could just pick 10.0.1.something. -- ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ Jake Messinger, VP. ph:713-772-6690 Visit: portmasters.com AMS, Inc. fx:713-774-3498 advmed.com 8300 Bissonnet #400 jake@jakes.org disc.cba.uh.edu Houston, Texas 77074 http://jakes.org ICQ# 4403734 Adjunct Professor University of Houston, CBA jake@uh.edu ~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~'`^`'~*-,._.,-*~ INVENTOR OF the _.,-*~' '~*-,._ SQUIGGLES (c) 1978 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.10.10112201043080.16440-100000>