Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 01 Dec 2007 09:19:49 +0100
From:      Dominic Fandrey <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de>
To:        Frank Staals <frankstaals@gmx.net>
Cc:        questions@freebsd.org, Freminlins <freminlins@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: 7.0 installation, and Xorg in particular
Message-ID:  <47511925.8080706@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <474F1E27.20906@gmx.net>
References:  <eeef1a4c0711281129l3ad2eb3fw41c599edc0611a2a@mail.gmail.com>	<474EBC23.3000901@gmx.de> <eeef1a4c0711290947h454694b9k26b7d92feffd90eb@mail.gmail.com> <474F1E27.20906@gmx.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Frank Staals wrote:
> Freminlins wrote:
> 
> <snip>
>> Err, yeah. Look through hundreds of packages to see which dependencies
>> they
>> have. Helpful. Not.
>>
>> This way of doing X11 is seriously unhelpful to end users. If having
>> individual packages for everything is so good, please tell me why
>> everything
>> in /bin, /usr/bin and so on is not an individual package. It's because
>> the
>> idea of doing so is dumb.
>>
>> Frem.
>>   
> Allthough I think the modular approach to Xorg is a good thing, I have
> to agree the xorg-meta port installs A LOT of ports. A xorg-lite port an
> xorg-lite port would be usefull for a user who is planning on installing
> a low-end X windows environment.  I  thought  I read at the
> freebsd-ports list such thing was being worked on some time ago. But I
> haven't heard anything about it anymore for quite some time now. What
> happened to that idea ?

I suppose because it's not needed:

# cd /usr/ports/x11/xorg
# make config-recursive

will allow you to make all your choices.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47511925.8080706>