Date: 24 Jul 2002 10:02:40 -0500 From: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do i stop fsck from autochecking? Message-ID: <8765z5jhin.fsf@pooh.int> In-Reply-To: <01ce01c232bf$73f16f20$0801a8c0@customfilmeffects.com> References: <013701c232a9$d7705400$0801a8c0@customfilmeffects.com> <87sn29kf6n.fsf@pooh.int> <01ce01c232bf$73f16f20$0801a8c0@customfilmeffects.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 2002-07-24T03:08:58Z, "David Smithson" <david@customfilmeffects.com> writes: > I'm not completely green. The reason I wanted to stop fsck in the first > place was so I could edit /etc/fstab, comment out the mount entry for that > particular array, finish the init sequence which includes another very > critical array, and run fsck manually on the dirty array. OK, that's reasonable. I (and the other posters) were hoping to save you trouble down the road, but your usage makes sense. > I understand that the CURRENT tree is separate from the STABLE tree. I > did not mean to misrepresent my intentions. I wasn't doubting that you knew that -CURRENT and -STABLE are seperate. I just wanted you be be perfectly clear that one is *not* an upgrade of the other in any way. You *may* get newer versions of a few tools, but you *will* get broken versions of others. -- Kirk Strauser The Strauser Group - http://www.strausergroup.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8765z5jhin.fsf>