Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Jul 1999 12:06:40 -0700
From:      Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>
To:        Per Lundberg <plundis@chaosdev.org>
Cc:        Alex Zepeda <garbanzo@hooked.net>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: glibc 
Message-ID:  <199907191906.MAA00611@dingo.cdrom.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Jul 1999 09:38:54 %2B0200." <Pine.LNX.4.10.9907190934290.11720-100000@abraham.chaosdev.org> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Sun, 18 Jul 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
> 
> > Perhaps if you explain what it is you're trying to accomplish, there might
> > be an easier option than porting *shudder* glibc?
> 
> I need a libc 100% compatible with glibc to make porting (from Linux)
> easier. And, as a side note, I think both FreeBSD and Linux would benefit
> of having compatible libc:s.

Uh, if you are using libc correctly, there should be no porting issues 
at all.

> Perhaps porting BSD libc to Linux would be easier?

Perhaps you should just fix the applications in the first place?

-- 
\\  The mind's the standard       \\  Mike Smith
\\  of the man.                   \\  msmith@freebsd.org
\\    -- Joseph Merrick           \\  msmith@cdrom.com




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199907191906.MAA00611>