Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 03:15:03 +0400 (MSD) From: "."@babolo.ru To: bsd@bsdhome.com (Brian Dean) Cc: "."@babolo.ru, julian@elischer.org, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Splitting up ports. Message-ID: <200206012315.DAA26277@aaz.links.ru> In-Reply-To: <20020601184529.A80856@neutrino.bsdhome.com> from "Brian Dean" at "Jun 1, 2 06:45:29 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brian Dean writes: > On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 01:05:22AM +0400, "."@babolo.ru wrote: > > And another end :-) of tree: > > I propose to group dependant ports > > in one ports directory to base port, for example: > > ports/x11-wm/sapphire/sapphire > > ports/x11-wm/sapphire/sapphire-themes > > ports/x11-wm/sapphire/sapphire-another-themes > > (no sapphire-another-themes in ports now) > > See ports/38593 Three level ports: Patch and new ports > > as another example with some patch. > > Sounds like a good way to tuck the over 700 p5-* ports into their own > directory within each category. I.e., /usr/ports/devel/p5/*, etc. Good point. p5-* ports are not programs but modules to expand given language (mostly?). So hierarchy as ports/lang/perl5/archivers/... ... ports/lang/perl5/devel/... ... ports/lang/ruby/... -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200206012315.DAA26277>